The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte AJIT PENDSE
and GREGORY H. KISOR
__________
Appeal No. 1999-2304
Application 08/667,242
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, GROSS and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-26, which constitute
all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to the field of
multi-point electronic conference scheduling. More
particularly, the invention facilitates selective access by
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007