Appeal No. 1999-2306
Application 08/639,284
recites a plurality of steps which are clearly not disclosed
by Lane and cannot properly be considered to be inherently
performed in Lane. Therefore, we do not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of claim 28.
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s
anticipation rejection with respect to claims 18, 20 and 21,
but we have not sustained the rejection with respect to each
of the other claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the
examiner rejecting claims 1-28 is affirmed-in-part.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007