Appeal No. 1999-2307
Application No. 08/711,074
Turning to the rejection of claims 3 and 16 as being unpatentable over Kazami in
view of Yoshida and Itoh, we note that Itoh does not provide the missing piece of
evidence which shows why one of ordinary skill in the art would only have modified one of
Kazami’s information signals. Therefore, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection of claims 3
and 16 for the same reasons as above.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
/vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007