The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN J. MOTTINE, JR.,
KENNETH S. KOEHLER,
SAYED J. MIRKAZEMI,
RICHARD S. CUPRAK, JR.,
GABRIEL P. PELLICCIOTTI,
and
TODD A. RHOADES
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-2316
Application No. 08/640,262
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4, 6
through 10, 13, 14, 31, 39, 40, 45 and 47 through 50.
The disclosed invention relates to a communications cable
that passes a standard plenum cable burn test, that meets
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007