Appeal No. 1999-2316
Application No. 08/640,262
Arpin et al. (Arpin) 5,563,377 Oct. 8,
1996
(filed Jun. 16, 1994)
Bleich et al. (Bleich) 5,600,097 Feb. 4, 1997
(filed Nov. 4, 1994)
TIA/EIA Standard: Commercial Building Telecommunications
Cabling Standard, Telecommunications Industry Association,
TIA/EIA-568-A, pp. 37, 39-45, 48-51, 2 unnumbered pages (Oct.
6, 1995) (hereinafter referred to as TIA/EIA Standard
document).
Claims 45 and 47 through 50 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, for lack of written description for
the formulas set forth in claims 45 and 48.
Claims 4, 7, 9, 13, 39 and 40 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Arroyo in view of
Bleich.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Arroyo in view of Bleich and Gerland.
Claims 8 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Arroyo in view of Bleich and Arpin.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Arroyo in view of Bleich and Nye.
Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Arroyo in view of Bleich, Nye and
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007