Appeal No. 1999-2379
Application 08/716,061
means" is met by the monitor screen 10 of the controller,
described at column 4, lines 24-31 (FR7 ¶ 5a). This finding
is correct.
Appellant argues that the Examiner "further ignored
Appellant's feature of displaying non-recorded commercial
material at both the send list displaying means and record
list displaying means as recited in claims 3, 9, 15, 22"
(Br14).
The Examiner's rationale does not cover the claim
language of "information that represents the non-recorded
commercial material is displayed on said record list
displaying means and said send list displaying means"
(claims 3, 9; similar language in claims 15 and 22). In
particular, the Examiner has provided no reason why it would
have been obvious to display the information representing
non-recorded commercial material on the send list displaying
means. Thus, the Examiner has failed to establish a prima
facie case of obviousness with respect to claims 3, 9, 15,
and 22. The rejection of claims 3, 9, 15, and 22 is
reversed.
CONCLUSION
- 15 -
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007