Ex parte KANEKO - Page 17




          Appeal No. 1999-2379                                                        
          Application 08/716,061                                                      

          the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of                         
          proceedings (37 CFR § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                  
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                        
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating                      
               to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the                       
               matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which                          
               event the application will be remanded to the                          
               examiner. . . .                                                        
                    (2) Request that the application be reheard                       
               under § 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals                        
               and Interferences upon the same record. . . .                          
               Should the Appellant elect to prosecute further before                 
          the Primary Examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in                   
          order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C.                  
          §§ 141 or 145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the                   
          effective date of the affirmance is deferred until                          
          conclusion of the prosecution before the Examiner unless, as                
          a mere incident to the limited prosecution, the affirmed                    
          rejection is overcome.                                                      
               If the Appellant elects prosecution before the Examiner                
          and this does not result in allowance of the application,                   
          abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned                
          to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for final                  
          action on the affirmed rejection, including any timely                      
          request for rehearing thereof.                                              
                                       - 17 -                                         





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007