Appeal No. 1999-2590 Application 08/618,120 wire mesh to cover the entire screen since it merely depends on the size of the screen, the size of the wire mesh, and the availability of the screen mesh in the market. Examiner’s Answer at page 5. We find that Appellants’ admitted prior art discloses that “it is known to use a wire screen placed directly in front of an LED display in order to enhance the contrast of the displayed image and to reduce glare.” Specification, page 1, lines 8-10. Additionally, Appellants’ admitted prior art states that “[i]n the prior art, the installation of the screen is done after the plurality of module block LED arrays have been arranged into a large display and a single large piece of wire screen is fastened to the entire display.” Specification, page 1, lines 19-22. Clearly, Appellants’ admitted prior art consisting of a large display and a single large piece of wire screen does not teach the claim limitations of “substantially each of said module block LED arrays including a respective individual wire screen attached to said selected face immediately over said at least one LED.” 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007