Ex Parte BRADLEY et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-2609                                                                                         
              Application No. 08/730,289                                                                                   


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
              The appellants’ invention relates to a method for combining house price forecasts.                           
              An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,                        
              which is reproduced below.                                                                                   
                     1.     A method of estimating the value of a real estate entity comprising                            
                     the steps, performed by a data processor, of:                                                         
                            accessing real estate data and a plurality of predictive models;                               
                            forming a plurality of estimates for the value of the real estate entity                       
                     based on the predictive models;                                                                       
                            selecting a plurality of best estimates according to a predetermined                           
                     criteria;                                                                                             
                            converting the best estimates into weighted estimates according to                             
                     the predetermined criteria; and                                                                       
                            combining the weighted estimates into a final estimate for the value                           
                     of the real estate entity.                                                                            
              No prior art references of record are relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                           
              appealed claims.                                                                                             
              Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being directed to nonstatutory                           
              subject matter, i.e. an abstract idea without limitation to a practical application.                         
              Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the                            
              appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's                         




                                                            2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007