Appeal No. 1999-2611
Application No. 08/808,537
the invention as set forth in claims 1 and 2. With
respect to the Examiner’s obviousness rejection, we are
also of the view that the evidence relied upon and the
level of skill in
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007