Appeal No. 1999-2698
Application 08/560,108
Examiner asserts that the positions and geometric features of15
the real objects in the computer spatial model have to be
determined in order to display the real objects in the
environment. The Examiner then points to Bajura at lines 6-7
of the first paragraph of section 4.2, section 4.4 and pages
206-207, as
clearly suggesting determining and storing the positions and
geometric features of the real objects in the computer spatial
model.
In response to Appellant's argument directed to the
combination of Sutherland's optical-see-through technology
with Bajura's video-see-through technology, the Examiner notes
that
the rejection only combined the prestoring means of Sutherland
with Bajura's display apparatus.
As to Appellant's argument directed to the time lag
aspects of the invention, the Examiner asserts that when
Bajura is modified as set forth in the rejection, it would
15Answer, page 7.
14
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007