Appeal No. 1999-2698
Application 08/560,108
Claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Bajura in view of Sutherland and
Ritchey and Ruoff.
These rejections are all based upon Bajura and Sutherland as
discussed above and the Examiner has only applied the
additional references in these rejections to the specific
limitations added by these dependent claims.
Claims 1, 4-7, 9, 13 and 19-20 are also rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bajura in view of
Deering.
Appellant has adopted the arguments previously made20
pertaining to Bajura to this rejection.
In addition, Appellant asserts that Deering has nothing21
to do with real objects, but is completely directed to virtual
objects, and does not suggest a computer and image processor
having positions and geometric features of real objects
20Brief, page 15.
21Brief, page 16.
19
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007