The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RYUICHI ENDA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-2799 Application No. 08/609,381 ____________ HEARD: OCTOBER 24, 2001 ____________ Before COHEN, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-19, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a pivoted saddle- type seat for a vehicle having a seat post (specification,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007