Appeal No. 1999-2839
Application 08/824,716
In construing the claims, we find that the plain language
of Appellants’ claim 1 requires first and second magnetic layers
wherein the second magnetic layer is formed above the first
magnetic layer. Referencing Gallagher’s Figure 4D, we find that
Gal l
agher
tea c
h e s
t w o
fer r
oma g
netic
layer
sta c
ks 10
a n d
30 wherein the second magnetic layer 30 is formed above the
first magnetic layer 10. Appellants’ claims further require
first 3 and second 8
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007