Technically, Shiokawa Preliminary Motion 3 (Paper No. 36) is still undecided. Shiokawa
Preliminary Motion 3 alleges that Maienfisch’s claims are unpatentable due to double patenting over
Maienfisch’s U.S. Patent No. 6,022,871 (SX 2011). Maienfisch, however, has filed a terminal
disclaimer (Paper No. 85, MX 1038) that obviates Shiokawa’s double patenting concerns.
Accordingly, Shiokawa Preliminary Motion 3 is denied.
17
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007