Interference No. 102,462
JAGANNATHA GOPALAKRISHNAN, ARTHUR W. SLEIGHT
and MUNIRPALLAM A. SUBRAMANIAN,
Junior Party,4
v.
HIROSHI MAEDA, YOSHIAKI TANAKA,
MASAO FUKUTOMI and TOSHIHISA ASANO
Senior Party5
___________
Patent Interference No. 102,462
____________
Before, CAROFF, PATE and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.640(e)
Junior parties Kugimiya et al. and von Schnering et al. were
ordered to show cause why judgment should not be entered against
them under 37 CFR § 1.640(d)(3). See Paper Nos. 391 and 392. In
addition, junior parties Chu and Gopalakrishnan et al. were ordered
to show cause why judgment should not be entered against them under
37 CFR § 1.640(d)(1). See Paper Nos. 393 and 394.
4Application 07/528,270, filed May 24, 1990. Accorded the
benefit of U.S. Applications 07/153,107, filed February 8, 1988,
and 07/152,186 filed February 4, 1988. Assigned to E.I. du Pont
de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, Delaware.
5Application 07/293,465, filed January 4, 1989. Accorded
the benefit of Japanese Application 10084/1988, filed January 20,
1988. Assigned to National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo,
Japan.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007