Interference No. 102,462
Junior parties Kugimiya et al. and von Schnering et al. each
filed responses to the order to show cause, but both failed to show
good cause why judgment should not be entered against them. See
Paper No. 407. Junior parties Chu and Gopalakrishnan et al., on
the other hand, did not respond to the order to show cause, and the
time for responding to the order has expired. Therefore, judgment
under 37 CFR § 1.640(e) is hereby entered.
Judgment6
Judgment as to Count 4, the sole count in issue, is entered
against junior party Ching-Wu Chu. Ching-Wu Chu is not entitled to
a patent containing claims 1-4, 6, 8, 9, 13 and 15-17 of
Application 07/163,956, filed March 3, 1988, which correspond to
Count 4.
Judgment as to Count 4 is entered against Kouichi Kugimiya,
Seiji Adachi, Osamu Inoue and Syunichiro Kawashima. Kouichi
Kugimiya, Seiji Adachi, Osamu Inoue and Syunichiro Kawashima are
not entitled to a patent containing claims 12 and 13 of Application
07/550,795, filed July 9, 1990, which correspond to Count 4.
6Junior party Gopalakrishnan et al. does not have any claims
which correspond to Count 4. See Decision on motion (10) in
Decision on Motions dated August 14, 2001 (Paper No. 389, pp. 11-
18) and Redeclaration dated August 14, 2001 (Paper No. 390).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007