DIONNE et al v. LIOTTA et al - Page 18




          Interference No. 103,906                                                      


          against any other retroviruses.  Thus, the scope of enablement is             
          not commensurate with the breadth of the claims.                              
               For all of the foregoing reasons, all of Dionne’s involved               
          claims are deemed unpatentable.  Accordingly, judgment is                     
          rendered as follows:                                                          
                                       Judgment                                         
               In view of our holding of unpatentability as to all of                   
          Dionne’s claims corresponding to the two counts in issue,                     
          judgment as to the subject matter of these counts is hereby                   
          awarded to Liotta et al., the senior party.                                   
               Accordingly, on the record before us in this interference,               
          Liotta et al. are entitled to a patent containing their claims                
          26-27, 31-40, 43-44 and 47-48 which correspond to the counts.                 
















                                          18                                            





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007