Interference No. 103,906 against any other retroviruses. Thus, the scope of enablement is not commensurate with the breadth of the claims. For all of the foregoing reasons, all of Dionne’s involved claims are deemed unpatentable. Accordingly, judgment is rendered as follows: Judgment In view of our holding of unpatentability as to all of Dionne’s claims corresponding to the two counts in issue, judgment as to the subject matter of these counts is hereby awarded to Liotta et al., the senior party. Accordingly, on the record before us in this interference, Liotta et al. are entitled to a patent containing their claims 26-27, 31-40, 43-44 and 47-48 which correspond to the counts. 18Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007