statements extolling the hand-held devices ability to enter data into an electronic system. See
Pitney Bowes Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 182 F.3d 1298, 1305, 51 USPQ2d 1161, 1165-1166
(Fed. Cir. 1999). Accordingly, requirement [2] gives life, meaning and vitality to the claim.
Kropa v. Robie, 187 F.2d 150, 152, 88 USPQ 478, 480-81 (CCPA 1951).
As such, the clear and unambiguous language of the count, taken as a whole, requires the
inventive device be capable of entering information into an electronic system.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007