CHARLTON v. ROSENSTEIN - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being                  
                     entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.             
          Paper 153                                                                   
          Filed by:  Trial Section Merits Panel                                       
          Box Interference                       Entered                              
          Washington, D.C.  20231             2 April 2001                            
          Tel:  703-308-9797                                                          
          Fax:  703-305-0942                                                          
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                                 DAVID E. CHARLTON,                                   
                                    Junior Party,                                     
                              (Application 08/465,675),                               
                                         v.                                           
                                ROBERT W. ROSENSTEIN,                                 
                                    Senior Party                                      
                                  (Patent 5,591,645                                   
                          Reissue Application 09/167,028).                            
                                   _______________                                    
                             Patent Interference 104,148                              
                                   _______________                                    

          Before:  McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge , and                 
          GARDNER-LANE and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                     

          GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  

                                   FINAL DECISION                                     

               A.   Introduction                                                      
               This interference is before a merits panel for entry of a              
          final decision.                                                             









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007