The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Paper No. 57 Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ SAMY BOUZIDA, CHRISTOPHE MIGNOT, and MIKE V. POWERS, Junior Party (Application 08/991,717), v. HENRY E. BEAMER and TIMOTHY A. COWELL Senior Party (Patent 5,730,214) _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,621 _______________ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Before LEE, GARDNER-LANE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge. A. Introduction As a result of the decision on preliminary motions (Paper 51), Bouzida became the junior party in this interference. The interference was redeclared to indicate that Bouzida is the junior party and that Beamer is the senior party (Paper 52).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007