that Bouzida wishes the board to consider at final hearing in
connection with the denial of Bouzida preliminary motion 1 (Paper
56 at 2).
For the reasons that follow, we deny Bouzida’s motion under
37 C.F.R. §§ 1.640(e)(3) and 1.635. We treat Bouzida’s response
to the order to show cause as a request for reconsideration of
our earlier decision denying Bouzida preliminary motion 1.
Bouzida’s request for reconsideration of the denial of Bouzida
preliminary motion 1 is denied. Finally, since Bouzida does not
contest the board’s decision that judgment should be entered
against Bouzida, we enter judgment against Bouzida.
B. Discussion
Bouzida motion for testimony and final hearing
Bouzida states in its motion under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.640(e)(3)
and 1.635, that “Bouzida does not contest the Board’s decision
that it is not entitled to a judgment of priority as the (sic)
Count” (Paper 56 at 2). Thus, Bouzida concedes priority to
Beamer.
Bouzida requests in its motion under 37 C.F.R. §§
1.640(e)(3) and 1.635, that Bouzida be granted a final hearing in
connection with its preliminary motion 1. Apparently, Bouzida
would also like to introduce evidence in support of its
preliminary motion 1 that we have not previously considered
(Paper 56 at 2).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007