The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GANG-BOCK LEE ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0009 Application No. 08/648,386 ____________ HEARD: May 24, 2001 ____________ Before FLEMING, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is a decision on the appellant’s request, (Paper No. 17), that we reconsider our decision in Ex parte Lee, No. 1999-0009 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. June 20, 2001), which affirmed the rejection of claims 9, 11-15, 17, 19, 20, and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over U.S. Patent No. 5,493,421 (Uetama) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,420,693 (Horiuchi) further in view of U.S. Patent No. 4,992,884 (Sakata) even further in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,335,085 (Nakatsuma). Our decision also reversed the rejection of claims 1, 7, and 8 under § 103(a) as being obvious over Uetama in view of Horiuchi;Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007