Ex parte DWIGGINS - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being                           
               entered today was not written for publication                          
               in a law journal and is not binding precedent                          
               of the Board.                                                          
                                                               Paper No. 24           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                             Ex parte JOHN H. DWIGGINS                                
                                         and                                          
                                   DINESH M. BHAT                                     
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-0855                                  
                             Application No. 08/248,543                               
                                                                                     
                                HEARD:  April 19, 2000                                
                                                                                     

          Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                 
               Appellants request reconsideration (rehearing) of our                  
          decision of May 18, 2000, wherein we affirmed the examiner's                
          rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and                 
          103.                                                                        


                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007