Appeal No. 1997-0855
Application No. 08/248,543
We note that appellants point to no argument in the Brief that
is specific to claim 24. Accordingly, we find no error in our
holding that claims 23-25 stand or fall together.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, appellants'
request is granted to the extent we have reconsidered our
decision, but we decline to make any change therein.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
DENIED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK:clm
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007