Ex parte OLSON - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0049                                                        
          Application 08/826,209                                                      


          1995                                                                        
          Okamura                              5-23903       Feb.  2,1                                                                    
          1993                                                                        
               (Japanese patent publication)                                          
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                     
          follows: claims 1, 2, 5-9, 12, 18 and 19 over Okamura in view               
          of Taniguchi, and claims 3 and 10 over Okamura in view of                   
          Taniguchi and the admitted prior art.                                       
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejections and remand the                
          application to the examiner.                                                
               Okamura discloses a diamond-coated cutter which “consists              
          of a substrate and a double diamond coat layer constituted by               
          a first diamond layer mainly composed of (100) crystal plane                
          formed via a wax material on the surface of the above-                      
          mentioned substrate and a second diamond layer mainly composed              
          of (111) crystal plane coated on the above-mentioned first                  
          diamond layer” (page 5).                                                    



               Citations herein to Okamura are to an English translation thereof, a copy of which is provided1                                                                     
          to the appellant with this decision.                                        
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007