The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TAKAYUKI SHIMAMUNE, MASASHI TANAKA,
YASUO NAKAJIMA, YOSHINORI NISHIKI AND
HIDETO SHIMIZU
__________
Appeal No. 2000-0110
Application 08/818,447
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before GARRIS, OWENS and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the refusal to allow claims 1-3, 5-7,
10, 12-17 and 19 as amended after final rejection. These are all
of the claims remaining in the application.
THE INVENTION
The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward an
electrolysis method for producing acid water and alkaline water.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007