The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID J. ECKER, OSCAR ACEVEDO, NORMAND HEBERT,
PETER W. DAVIS, JACQUELINE R. WYATT, and JOHN S. KIELY
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0122
Application No. 08/309,925
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WALTZ, DELMENDO, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 43, 44, 46 through 51, and 54 through 59.
Claims 1 through 42, 52, 53, 60 and 61 are the only other claims
in this application and stand withdrawn from consideration by
the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007