Ex Parte WILLIAMS et al - Page 9



          Appeal No. 2000-0131                                                        
          Application No. 08/800,972                                                  

          which case neither of the body bias transistors 84 and 86 are               
          turned on.                                                                  
               In reaching this conclusion, we are further persuaded by the           
          Examiner’s presentation of evidence in the form of the Moyer                
          reference which, in analyzing the operation of the Fuller circuit,          
          discloses that both of Fuller’s body bias transistors are “... off          
          simultaneously whenever the voltages at the drain and source of             
          transistor 10 are very nearly the same.”  (Moyer, column 1, lines           
          59-63).  As pointed out by the Examiner (Answer, page 6), although          
          the language “very nearly the same” implies a very small voltage            
          range, it nonetheless clearly indicates a non-zero interval or              
          “deadband” during which both body bias transistors in Fuller are            
          simultaneously off.                                                         
               Turning to a consideration of the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) rejection of claims 18, 20, 24, and 31, we note that,              
          while we found Appellants’ arguments to be unpersuasive with                
          respect to claims 16, 17, 19, and 25-29 discussed supra, we reach           
          the opposite conclusion with respect to claims 18, 20, 24, and 31.          










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007