The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WALTER KOPP ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0154 Application No. 08/942,954 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The examiner rejected the appellant‘s claims 21-36. He appeals therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The appellant’s invention fixes “duplex” toner images, i.e., toner images printed on both sides of a paper. Conventional electrographic printers use a preheating saddle, a heated fixing drum, and a pressure roller to fix tonerPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007