Appeal No. 2000-0170 Application No. 08/811,124 Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102 A prior art reference anticipates the subject of a claim when the reference discloses every feature of the claimed invention, either explicitly or inherently. (See Hazani v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 126 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1358, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1997) and RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Lee In accordance with the above guidelines, the examiner, to meet the recited limitation of “said plug and said metallization line are electrically connected and have a substantially continuous composition gradient of a selected alloy element between said first metal and said second metal” (claim 41), asserts (answer at page 4) that (in Lee): because of the silicon diffusion from one metal layer to another metal layer during heat treatment, the diffusion equilibrium is inherently formed between the contacting surface of the first metal and the second metal. Therefore, the limitation of having a substantially continuous composition gradient of a selected alloy element between the first metal and the second metal is inherently met by Fig. 5 of Lee.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007