The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAZUHIKO AMANO
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0194
Application No. 08/774,126
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LALL, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 20 and 21, the only pending
claims in the application.
The disclosed invention is related to watches, but more
particularly to watches that display information in addition to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007