The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEFAN GOSS and DIETMAR KELL ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0235 Application No. 08/765,502 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. LALL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 11,12, 14 and 16-22, which constitute all the pending claims in the application. According to appellants (brief at pages 2 and 3), the present invention relates to a device for providing information to a motor vehicle driver. The device includes a decoder for receiving and decoding digitally coded traffic messages, and an auto navigator for determining an instantaneous position of the vehicle and calculating route recommendations. The device include one data storage medium storing both a digitally coded road map and information necessary for decoding andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007