Ex Parte GOSS et al - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                

                                                                                                          Paper No. 17              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                          Ex parte STEFAN GOSS and DIETMAR KELL                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 2000-0235                                                         
                                                     Application No. 08/765,502                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                           ____________                                                             
               Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of                    
               claims 11,12, 14 and 16-22, which constitute all the pending claims in the application.                              
                       According to appellants (brief at pages 2 and 3), the present invention relates to a device for              
               providing information to a motor vehicle driver.  The device includes a decoder for receiving and                    
               decoding digitally coded traffic messages, and an auto navigator for determining an instantaneous                    
               position of the vehicle and calculating route recommendations.  The device include one data storage                  
               medium storing both a digitally coded road map and information necessary for decoding and                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007