Ex Parte GOSS et al - Page 5

               Appeal No. 2000-0235                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/765,502                                                                                           


                       Since claims 12, 14 and 16-22 contain at least the recited limitations of claim 11, and                      
               Duckeck (with respect to claim 16) does not cure the deficiency noted above, we do not sustain the                   
               obviousness rejection of these claims.                                                                               
                       The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 11, 12, 14 and 16-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                  
               is reversed.                                                                                                         
                                                            REVERSED                                                                



                                      MICHAEL R. FLEMING                             )                                              
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                    )                                              
                                                                                     )                                              
                                                                                     )                                              
                                                                                     )                                              
                                                                                     ) BOARD OF PATENT                              
                                      JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO                             )     APPEALS                                  
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                    )       AND                                    
                                                                                     )  INTERFERENCES                               
                                                                                     )                                              
                                                                                     )                                              
                                                                                     )                                              
                                      PARSHOTAM S. LALL                              )                                              
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                    )                                              

               PSL/lp                                                                                                               
               RICHARD L. MAYER                                                                                                     
               KENYON & KENYON                                                                                                      
               ONE BROADWAY                                                                                                         
               NEW YORK, NY 10004                                                                                                   


                                                                 5                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007