Appeal No. 2002-0252
Application No. 08/735,159
the examiner has not made a prima case in rejecting claims 2, 5
and 7 through 10 over Lanzetta and Mankovitz.
The examiner rejects claims 3, 4 and 6 (answer at pages 4
and 5) over Lanzetta in view of Mankovitz and Henze. However,
since Henze does not cure the deficiency of the combination of
Lanzetta and Mankovitz, and noting that these claims contain at
least the limitations recited in independent claim 2, we also do
not sustain the rejection of claims 3, 4 and 6 over Lanzetta in
view of Mankovitz and Henze.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 2 through 10
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
Parshotam S. Lall )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Joseph L. Dixon ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Stuart S. Levy )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007