Appeal No. 2000-0274
Application No. 08/724,568
message as described in the admitted prior art. Neither Faris
nor Hamamoto teaches or would have suggested to the skilled
artisan such a “message length.” Thus, the obviousness
rejection of claims
13 and 18 is reversed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007