The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRIS E. SHUCHART
and
RICK D. GDANSKI
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0316
Application No. 08/587,821
____________
HEARD: APRIL 23, 2002
____________
Before LIEBERMAN, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 26, 27, 72 through 78, and 82. Claims 35-42, and 68 through
71, 79 through 81 and 83 through 85 have been allowed. Claims 1 through 25, 28
through 35 and 43 through 67 have been canceled.
THE INVENTION
The invention is directed to a method for acidizing an aluminum containing
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007