The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KEVIN D. WINNER ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0328 Application No. 08/863,345 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-471, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1 An amendment (Paper No. 10, filed July 13, 2002) was filed subsequent to the final rejection. The copy of the claims accompanying the brief include the proposed changes. However, there is no indication in the record that the amendment has been entered by the examiner. Accordingly, the claims before us on appeal are claims as they stood at the time of the final rejection. Because the proposed changes to the claims were merely to correct informalities, this issue should be addressed with the examiner subsequent to the decision on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007