Ex Parte DAMIEN - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2000-0330                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/684,871                                                  

               Claim 18, which is representative for present purposes,                
          follows:                                                                    
               18. A packet switching telecommunications network                      
               comprising:                                                            
                    a plurality of switching nodes between which                      
               packets are transported by logic paths, one of said                    
               logic paths being a main path between a first and a                    
               second switching node, and                                             
                    means for linking at least a substitute logic path                
               to said main path for transporting the same packets as                 
               packets transported by said main path,                                 
                    said second node comprising switching means for                   
               switching from the main path to the substitute path,                   
                    characterized in that the second node further                     
               comprises:                                                             
                    calculation means for calculating a time shift                    
               between packets received on said main path and on said                 
               substitute path, and                                                   
                    check means, responsive to said time shift, for                   
               checking the switching to avoid packet losses or packet                
               duplications.                                                          
          (Paper No. 9 at 1-2.)                                                       

               The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the                 











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007