Ex parte STIRLING et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 15         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                  Ex parte MICHAEL F. STIRLING and DAN E. GREMONPREZ                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0339                                 
                              Application No. 08/911,933                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               The examiner rejected claims 1-5, 22, and 23.  The                     
          appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We                   
          reverse.                                                                    


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants’ invention is a system of scoring consoles              
          for a bowling scoring system.  Bowling scoring consoles are                 
          conventionally organized around pairs of bowling lanes; a                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007