Appeal No. 2000-0339 Page 7
Application No. 08/911,933
movable, we are not persuaded of that teachings from the prior
art would have suggested combining the teachings of the
references. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 1-
5, 22, and 23 as obvious over Mowers in view of Petrich.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-5, 22, and 23 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007