Appeal No. 2000-0376
Application 08/753,236
indicating the usual postage meter information of date, amount of
the fee, block patterns, etc.
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1, 7, 9, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dietrich and Bruns.
Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, and IBIP.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, and Cordery.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Cordery, and either Johnsen or
Schwartz.
Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Cordery, Kipphan, and either
Johnsen or Schwartz.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, and Official Notice that it
was known to use human readable codes.
Claims 10, 11, and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Morrison,
and Mizutani.
Claims 12-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, and Morrison.
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007