Appeal No. 2000-0376
Application 08/753,236
Claims 17, 18, 25-28, and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, and Kim.
Claims 19-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Billington, and Chapman.
Claims 23, 24, 29, 32, and 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Morrison,
and Kim.
Claims 22, 31, and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Morrison,
Mizutani, and Kim.
Claims 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, Kim, and Smaha.
Claims 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Dietrich, Bruns, and Zabele.
We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 5) (pages
referred to as "FR__") and the examiner's answer (Paper No. 12)
(pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the Examiner's
rejection, and to the appeal brief (Paper No. 11) (pages referred
to as "Br__") for a statement of Appellant's arguments
thereagainst.
- 6 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007