The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HOWARD P. GROGER, SHUFANG LUO, K. PETER LO, MARTIN
WEISS, JAMES M. SLOAN, and RUSSELL J. CHURCHILL
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0391
Application No. 08/553,773
____________
REHEARING
____________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Pursuant to the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.197(b)(1997),
appellants have submitted a Request for Rehearing dated Mar. 14,
2002, (hereafter “Request”), of our Decision dated Feb. 15, 2002,
affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 10, and 19-26
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of enablement,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007