Appeal No. 2000-0391 Application No. 08/553,773 discussed above, the analysis of the examiner’s rejection in our Decision took into account the scope of the claims, as required by the statute and the holdings of our reviewing court. Accordingly, we do not find in the Request any argument convincing us of error in the conclusions we reached in our Decision. Therefore, appellants’ Request for Rehearing is denied. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). DENIED Edward C. Kimlin ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Thomas A. Waltz ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Beverly A. Pawlikowski ) Administrative Patent Judge ) TAW/tdl 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007