The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS MICHAEL ALBERS, JOHN VERNON EBERST, DARWIN FONTENOT, RICHARD LYNN PYRA, MARK WILLIAM WELKER, PAUL BERTON WOOD, and JACK E. BRESENHAM ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0414 Application No. 08/811,101 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 24-35, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007