Ex Parte FARQUHAR et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                       Paper No. 16                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                 Ex parte DONALD SETON FARQUHAR, GERARD PAUL KOHUT                    
                              and ANDREW MICHAEL SEMAN                                
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2000-0422                                  
                               Application 08/864,044                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before RUGGIERO, LALL and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 5, the only pending              
          claims for consideration in the application.                                
               The disclosed invention is adequately described by the                 
          following claim.                                                            

                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007