The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte DONALD SETON FARQUHAR, GERARD PAUL KOHUT and ANDREW MICHAEL SEMAN ________________ Appeal No. 2000-0422 Application 08/864,044 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before RUGGIERO, LALL and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. LALL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 5, the only pending claims for consideration in the application. The disclosed invention is adequately described by the following claim. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007