Ex Parte FARQUHAR et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0422                                                        
          Application 08/864,044                                                      

               1.   An electrical device comprising:                                  
               a metal substrate having a micro roughened surface;                    
               a layer of electrically conducive thermoset adhesive of a              
          thickness of at least about 0.5 mils and no greater than about 2            
          mils bonded to said micro roughened surface of said metal                   
          substrate; and                                                              
               a component having a conductive ground plane coating and a             
          surface topography associated therewith up to 4 mils height                 
          variation bonded to said adhesive to form an essentially void               
          free and thin bondline relative to said surface topography.                 
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Iliou et al. (Iliou)          4,616,413           Oct. 14, 1986             
          Kukanskis (Kukanskis)         5,037,482           Aug.  6, 1991             
               Claims 1 and 5 stand rejected1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Iliou in view of Kukanskis.                         
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants and the                 
          Examiner, we make reference to the brief (paper no. 11), reply              
          brief (paper no. 14) and the Examiner’s answer (paper no. 13) for           
          the respective details thereof.                                             
                                      OPINION                                         
               We have considered the rejections advanced by the Examiner             
          and the supporting arguments.  We have, likewise, reviewed the              
          Appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs.                              

               1  The drawing of the Appellants’ disclosure does not seem             
          to satisfy the requirement of 37 CFR 1.83(a).                               
                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007