Appeal No. 2000-0467
Application 08/511,645
to the first object, such as printing, reads on Appellant’s
limitation of performing a service with respect to said first
object if said first object is a service object.
Lastly, we find that Berry teaches the step of “moving the
representation of the first object from said first location to a
new location associated with said second object if said second
object is a container object, regardless of a source of the first
object. In particular, we find that Berry teaches this
limitation when disclosing that, “[a] container object, such as a
folder, is used primarily as a place to store other objects . . .
[and] objects that are dropped on a container’s icon are moved
into that container.” (Emphasis added). See page 435, first
column, last paragraph through second column, first paragraph of
Berry. Therefore, we find that Berry’s function of moving an
object to a container, such as the folder, reads on Appellant’s
limitation of moving the representation of the first object from
said first location to a new location when the second object is a
container object. Finally, we fail to find anything in Berry
that teaches that the first object would not be moved when the
second object is a folder, without regard to the source of the
first object.
As stated supra, Appellant argues that in reference to the
13
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007