Ex parte WARREN - Page 2



                     Appeal No. 2000-0469                                                                                                               Page 2                         
                     Application No. 08/936,321                                                                                                                                        
                                The only independent claim 1 present in the application is reproduced as follows:                                                                      

                                1.     A grid array interconnect structure for use in interconnecting a high density multichip                                                         
                     interconnect decal or land grid array package having a plurality of interconnect pads to a printed wiring                                                         
                     board having a plurality of input/output pads, said interconnect structure comprising:                                                                            
                                double-sided nonconductive transfer tape having adhesive disposed on both sides thereof, and                                                           
                     having conductive epoxy interconnects formed therethrough that are configured to connect to the                                                                   
                     interconnect pads of the high density multichip interconnect decal, or the land grid array package, the                                                           
                     input/output pads of the printed wiring board.                                                                                                                    

                                                                                   References                                                                                          

                                The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:                                                                                               

                     Shreeve et al. (Shreeve)                                         5,046,953                                  Sep. 10, 1991                                         
                     Cranston et al. (Cranston)                                       4,902,857                                  Feb. 20, 1990                                         



                                                                             Rejections at Issue                                                                                       

                                Claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shreeve and                                                                 

                     Cranston.                                                                                                                                                         

                                Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the Examiner, we make reference to the                                                                
                     Briefs  and the Answer for the respective details thereof.1                                                                                                                                                        



                                                                                   OPINION                                                                                             

                                After a careful review of the evidence before us, we do not agree with the Examiner that claims                                                        

                     1 through 5 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Shreeve and Cranston.                                                                                     


                                1Appellant filed an Appeal Brief on May 24, 1999.  Appellant then filed a Reply Brief on                                                               
                     September 14, 1999.  The Examiner mailed an Office communication on November 24, 1999 stating                                                                     
                     that the Reply Brief has been entered.                                                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007